Why do most scientists believe human activity is causing atmospheric temperature increases?

The majority of evidence supporting the idea that human activity is causing atmospheric temperature increases has undergone peer review. This rigorous process involves evaluation by other experts in the field before research findings are published, ensuring that the methods and conclusions are scrutinized for validity and reliability. The peer-review process builds a strong consensus in the scientific community regarding the impacts of human activities, such as greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial processes, on climate change. As a result, the robust and verifiable nature of this evidence leads most scientists to confidently attribute observed increases in global temperatures primarily to human-induced factors.